Could rushing a coronavirus vaccine cause more harm?
Japan also reported reinfection in a patient who has recovered from the novel coronavirus disease. Japanese health officials said a woman who was declared virus-free had tested positive again. Now, scientists are left baffled about these cases.
Professor Mark Harris, a virology expert at Leeds University, said that reinfection is unlikely, but there is some evidence from previous studies for persistent infections of animal coronaviruses.
Sir Patrick Wallace, the UK government’s chief scientific adviser, and Professor Chris Whitty, the chief medical adviser, reassured the public that those who had the infection would develop some immunity, and it is a rare occurrence that a person can contract the infection again.
Health experts believe positive retests are more likely to be errors in testing, rather than reinfection. Further, some experts agree that reinfection is an unlikely explanation for patients who gets a positive result a second time. They note that testing error could be the culprit, or doctors have released the patients too early, making them positive during a retest. Shed high levels of coronavirus
People who are infected and harbor the virus shed high levels of the pathogen, but most are likely not infectious once recovery begins.
A new study in Germany cites that early on in the infection of patients, they emit high levels of the coronavirus, which helps explain its rapid and efficient way of spread across the globe. Many countries experience the vast spread of the virus, where most are through local transmission. Each day, thousands of new cases are being reported in Europe, the new epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak.
The study, published on a preprint server , which is not yet peer-reviewed by health experts, sheds light on how virulent the virus is, infection thousands of people. So far, the virus has infected 196,640 people and killed 7,894 patients.
The study found that people with mild infections can still get positive results by throat swabs for days and even weeks after their illness. Those who are only mildly sick are likely not infectious by approximately ten days after the onset of symptoms.
“This is a very important contribution to understanding both the natural history of Covid-19 clinical disease as well as the public health implications of viral shedding,” Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Policy, said. Sources:
Also in Industry News
How to decide whether or not to start treatment for prostate cancer?
Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome via visual tools
$65m investment increases British Patient Capital’s exposure to life sciences and health technology