Snake stem cells create real venom to use as medicine
In all sectors, direct health care costs increased with increasing body mass index. Average direct costs per person per year (PPPY) increased from about $4,500 for non-obese workers, to $7,150 for those with class I, $9,700 for class II, and $19,000 for class III obesity. Medical-related absenteeism and disability costs showed similar trends.
"Compared with the healthcare industry, direct healthcare costs by obesity class were higher in several other US industries," the researchers write. The greatest excess direct costs were seen for employees with class III obesity in the government/education/religious services (GERS) sector, about $5,600 PPPY; food/entertainment services, $4,900 PPPY; and technology sectors ($4,300 PPPY). Compared to healthcare, obese GERS workers were more than twice as likely to be in the highest category of direct costs (80 th percentile or higher).
The study adds to previous evidence that obesity-related costs are higher in some industries than others. Because of their training, healthcare employees may feel better able to deal with health problems on their own -; or might feel ashamed of needing medical care for obesity-related issues.
For other industrial sectors studied -; manufacturing and energy, transportation, finance and insurance, and retail stores and consumer goods -; were not significantly higher than in healthcare. The researchers conclude:
Information regarding the industry-specific trends in obesity-related spending...will contribute towards the implementation and tailoring of employer-based weight management programs according to the specific needs of each industry subpopulation in order to achieve effective and sustained improvements in employee health." Source:
Wolters Kluwer Health Journal reference:
Ramasamy, A.L., et al. (2020) Direct, Absenteeism, and Disability Cost Burden of Obesity Among Privately Insured Employees. A Comparison of Healthcare Industry Versus Other Major Industries in the United States. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine . doi.org/10.1097/JOM. 1761 .
Also in Industry News
How to decide whether or not to start treatment for prostate cancer?
Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome via visual tools
$65m investment increases British Patient Capital’s exposure to life sciences and health technology